I thought the js debugger was out of process (or trying to be)?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel <mar...@chromium.org> wrote:
> the js debugger
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Dean McNamee <de...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> What for?
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Erik Kay <erik...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> v8 is already in the browser process.
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Evan Martin <e...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does this mean we'll have v8 in the browser process?
>>>>
>>>> We had idly chatted about running a 64-bit browser process to fix the
>>>> library hell on Linux. It shouldn't block you either way -- I'm just
>>>> curious.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to commit a change
>>>>> (http://codereview.chromium.org/19737/diff/1440/1448 ) which adds a
>>>>> base class for unit tests that exercise JavaScript. It uses v8.h,
>>>>> which is disallowed by DEPS. What is the right way to do this?
>>>>>
>>>>> - a
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
