On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Ben Laurie<b...@chromium.org> wrote:
> I'd be happy to do that. When I do, there's something that's already
> puzzling me, and that's OS_POSIX.
>
> I don't have a copy of the POSIX standard, at least not a recent one,
> so its hard to know what is or isn't POSIX, and I imagine I am not
> alone in that. However, various comments lead me to believe that
> OS_POSIX doesn't really mean "POSIX" in people's minds - it really
> means "UNIXish" or "not Windows" or something.
>
> How would I document this define? Is there an agreed meaning?
I think it should just be POSIX. The places that Linux and the BSDs
will disagree are exactly the bits that aren't POSIX. You don't need
a POSIX spec for this; libc man pages have a "CONFORMING TO" section.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
