Scott C. Frase wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 11:45 -0600, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
>> Your disk performance may be holding you back as well. On the oil
>> effect, you are CPU bound, on a faster effect (e.g. grayscale) you
>> will be primarily IO bound. Here's an example. Only recently (in the
>> past 3 years) has Discreet moved to x86. Before that they were selling
>> their highest end product (for editing 4K film) on a quad CPU 1Ghz.
>> But they smoked the competition when it came to performance. Why? Most
>> of the time these systems had a 10-30 fibre channel RAID behind them.
>> This allowed the Tezro and Onyx3 systems to edit 5 streams of
>> real-time 4k video on a system that had basically no number crunching
>> power. 9 times out of 10 you will be limited by your disk performance,
>> not the CPU.
>>
>> I would suggest running a bonnie++ benchmark on your disks, from there
>> you can calculate an approximate max fps processing rate for the
>> disks.
>>
>> Timothy
> Hi Timothy,
> Thanks for the thought.  I have been monitoring wait i/o via mpstat and
> it doesn't seem to be the issue.  Here's recent output of mpstat using a
> bunch of effects on a HDV video render, including oil painting.  The
> sixth column is iowait:
> 
> 01:15:45 PM  CPU   %user   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal
> %idle    intr/s
> 01:15:55 PM    0   87.30    0.00    0.60    0.00    0.00    0.30    0.00
> 11.80    150.20
> 01:15:55 PM    1   87.40    0.00    0.70    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
> 11.90    127.90
> 01:15:55 PM    2   86.70    0.00    0.40    0.20    0.00    0.30    0.00
> 12.40    150.20
> 01:15:55 PM    3   87.71    0.00    0.30    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
> 11.99    128.00
> 01:15:55 PM    4   87.40    0.00    0.40    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
> 12.20    134.30
> 01:15:55 PM    5   87.10    0.00    0.60    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
> 12.30    128.00
> 01:15:55 PM    6   86.70    0.00    0.10    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
> 13.20    134.10
> 01:15:55 PM    7   86.80    0.00    0.20    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00
> 13.00    128.50
> 
> 
> Notice that iowait is zero.  I do have a couple of RAID 0 filesystems,
> one based on software RAID and the other hardware.
> 
> scott

Cinelerra has some race problems between threads which let them wait on
each other doing nothing, this is hard to fix unfortunally. But
generally I think adding more CPU's will add some performance
improvement. While in doubt, you may better opt for more ram (4 or more
GB of ram). For long time future I we will fix this (with what is called
cinelerra 3 now) to have no races and utilize multi cpu systems much
bettter, but don't hold your breath yet for that.

        Christian

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra


_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

Reply via email to