type-2 ;) On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Ivan Pepelnjak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > while configuring an OSPF process for a VRF on a Cisco 3550-12G > > > (running 12.2(25)SE) I notice that the command "passive-interface" > > > is unavailable. How can this be? Is there another way I can > > suppress > > > routing updates on an interface? > > > > You can put actual network commands in ospf configuration section. For > > example: > > > > network 172.16.8.1 0.0.0.0 > > network 172.17.0.30 0.0.0.0 > > network 172.17.0.242 0.0.0.0 > > > > It will activate interfaces in the target VRF only. You can > > redistribute > > any other routes you need to announce. > > ... And we're back to the neverending question: ignoring the obvious > implications for stub areas, is it better to advertise connected subnets as > parts of router (type-1) LSA or as individual external (type-5) routes? > > Any thoughts or preferences? > Ivan > > http://www.ioshints.info/about > http://blog.ioshints.info/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
