Hi, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 05:17:56PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: > Like IPv6, I think it would be reasonable to add "must > support hop-by-hop traceroute" for upstream bids, since > everyone loves to run MPLS these days, even when it's > probably unnecessary.
We actually seem to manage to put our money where our mouth is on
this round of upstream contract renegotiations - going away from
one of our current ISPs that does TTL hiding, to one that doesn't.
(MPLS is a useful tool, and MPLS TE can actually add lots of value to an
upstream provider's offering *iff* properly managed - but I want to *see*
where my packets travel, and where they detour)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpC22mx7VGXp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
