On Friday, September 02, 2011 02:15:06 PM Vincent Touchard wrote: > While speaking of 3600X, we are thinking about using 2 of > them at each end of a 10G point-to-point WAN link, > possibly running VPLS (not sure we really need this, > QinQ may suffise). According to our SE, VPLS is > supported but they have never tested our topology (ie > only 2 boxes put back to back) and are appearantly not > 100% sure it will work.
If your topology is just these 2 devices back-to-back, why would you want to complicate your life with things like VPLS and such? 802.1Q Trunking should be simple enough. You could even do some IP routing if necessary, but I think VPLS would be overkill in this topology. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
