On Friday, September 02, 2011 06:30:27 PM Vincent Touchard wrote: > The goal is to extend site A to site B during their move. > On the LAN side, one interface per "department" and > several vlans per interface. We do not control the > network of the departments (number of vlans, vlan ids, > size of broadcast domains, ...). Solution #1 whould be > to do QinQ, with one outer vlan per department.
Ah, okay. See what you mean now. > We are considering EoMPLS/VPLS as an alternative to QinQ, > but have little to no experience with it. You could hybrid them, although you know best about your topology/requirements to decide that. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
