how do you route for customers who don't have BGP? /30 on the interface then static route the prefix or the prefix on the inteface? because, the latter causes a lot of ARP and Spanning tree traffic.
Waseem ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Loch <[email protected]> To: NSP <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:26 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco AS9K 70% seems *really* high an for rsp720. Are you sure it's not a sup720? The two have vastly different cpu performance (about 10x it seems). I have several rsp720 with many full bgp transit feeds + peer routes and my typical cpu usage is only 10%. What IOS image are you running and what else are you doing on this box besides bgp that could be eating cpu? I had one rsp720 recently (curiously the only one I have seen with 4g ram instead of 2g) that had 70% cpu usage after a few bgp sessions came up. The 'show ibc' output indicated several hundred thousand pps to and from the RP so something was obviously wrong. Swapped out with a different rsp720 and everything was fine (10% cpu, 100pps on IBC). - Kevin Manuel Marín wrote: > We are using the RSP720 and 3CXLs. Both have performance issues when dealing > with multiple BGP sessions, When one of the full bgp peer flaps or when > there is a link flap the other routing protocols start to flap as well. I'll > try to tweak the timers in the mean time. Usually the CPU usage is around > 70%. > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Waseem <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Manuel, >> >> What are the supervisor engines that you are using on the 7600 routers. >> >> Regards, >> Waseem >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Waseem <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We've been in the same situation, a small note: per slot capacity of the >> ASR9K is 320G it takes 40G and 100G SPAs while for NE40E-X3 is 40G, almost >> the same as Cisco's 7600. >> >> Regards, >> Waseem >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Manuel Marín <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:56 AM >> *Subject:* [c-nsp] Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco AS9K >> >> Hi >> >> We are currently looking for alternatives to upgrade cisco 76XX routers >> and >> we are comparing Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco ASR9K. I was wondering if someone >> can share their experience with Huawey routers as Core MPLS routers. >> >> Any advice would be greatly appreciated >> >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Manuel Marín >> Transtelco Inc. >> 1.9152172232 >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
