ISL and done deal- John Neiberger wrote: > Ok, I'm suffering from a brain cloud at the moment. So, willing to suffer > the comic flames and arrows, I ask the following question: > > Assume we have three switches: A, B, and C. A has a fast ethernet > connection to B and another to C. B and C are not directly connected. At > this point, these are not trunk lines and they are in the same VLAN. That > means only traffic destined for B goes down the line to B, and traffic > destined for C goes to C. > > Now, if I were to make both of those connections trunk lines, either ISL or > 802.1q, would I still have only B-destined traffic going to B or would that > trunk be passing all traffic for that entire VLAN up to B even though > C-destined traffic is a waste of bandwidth on the B trunk? > > Thanks for the help, as always! > > _______________________________________________________ > Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite > Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp > > ___________________________________ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---
begin:vcard n:Patel;Shetal tel;pager:888-657-7833 tel;cell:201-924-4947 tel;fax:212-675-8668 tel;home:212-675-9300 tel;work:212-675-9300 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.sitesmith.com org:www.SiteSmith.com;SM adr:;;450 West 15th Steet;New York;New Yrok;10011;USA version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Network Site Engineer note;quoted-printable:=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0D=0ASmarter then the Average Bear!=0D=0A=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D fn:ShaQ-Cisco Certified Network Associate end:vcard
