switch=bridge (multiport in ASIC) = transparent, MAC address learning-type
thing, hence

broadcast > all switches (with that VLAN)
unicast > switch with attached MAC address

proviso:

first packet of unicast stream to unknown MAC > broadcast (to determine
attached switch)

maybe a little after the fact, but makes sense to me at least

Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Fred Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 6:02 AM
Subject: Re: VLAN Trunk traffic question


> Thank you!  I've been trying to find the answer to that for a while now.
I
> don't have a way to test it on our production network or I would have
simply
> set it up and watched what happened.  My bosses get a little upset when I
> start playing with our corporate backbone switches just for the fun of it.
> :-)  silly people...  It's not like I'd hurt something...well, there was
> that one time when I made the 7513 reboot...during business
> hours....twice....oops...
>
> Thanks again!
>
> John Neiberger
>
> >  To answer your question, I believe the switch ports, whether trunked or
> not,
> >  still forward based on the table of learned MAC-addresses.
> >
> >  Meaning that a VLANx packet, assuming the destination MAC address is
> already
> >  learned, will only traverse the trunk port towards the valid
destination.
> >
> >  ------
> >  Fred Nielsen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >  ------
> >
> >
> >  John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >  24049784.959891399421.JavaMail.imail@tiptoe">news:24049784.959891399421.JavaMail.imail@tiptoe...
> >  : In this case, though, both switches B and C are in the same VLAN, but
I
> >  : wouldn't want traffic destined for C going down the trunk connected
to
> B.
> >  : This would be a waste of time and bandwidth.  I'm trying to determine
> if
> >  the
> >  : trunk will pass ALL traffic for that VLAN, or only VLAN traffic that
is
> >  : actually destined for an endhost on the opposite end of a particular
> >  trunk.
> >  : :-)  That barely makes sense....heh heh.
> >  :
> >  : >  If you use ISL, it will pass traffic only if it is destined for
that
> >  : VLAN. It
> >  : >  does frame tagging.
> >  : >  It won't pass unnecessary traffic.
> >  : >
> >  : >
> >  : >
> >  : >  John Neiberger wrote:
> >  : >
> >  : >  > Ok, I'm suffering from a brain cloud at the moment.  So, willing
> to
> >  : suffer
> >  : >  > the comic flames and arrows, I ask the following question:
> >  : >  >
> >  : >  > Assume we have three switches: A, B, and C.  A has a fast
ethernet
> >  : >  > connection to B and another to C.  B and C are not directly
> >  connected.
> >  : At
> >  : >  > this point, these are not trunk lines and they are in the same
> VLAN.
> >  : That
> >  : >  > means only traffic destined for B goes down the line to B, and
> >  traffic
> >  : >  > destined for C goes to C.
> >  : >  >
> >  : >  > Now, if I were to make both of those connections trunk lines,
> either
> >  : ISL or
> >  : >  > 802.1q, would I still have only B-destined traffic going to B or
> >  would
> >  : that
> >  : >  > trunk be passing all traffic for that entire VLAN up to B even
> though
> >  : >  > C-destined traffic is a waste of bandwidth on the B trunk?
> >  : >  >
> >  : >  > Thanks for the help, as always!
> >  : >  >
> >  : >  > _______________________________________________________
> >  : >  > Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
> >  : >  > Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp
> >  : >  >
> >  : >  > ___________________________________
> >  : >  > UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> >  : >  > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> >  : >  > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  : >  > ---
> >  : >
> >  : >  ___________________________________
> >  : >  UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> >  : >  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com
> >  : >  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  :
> >  :
> >  :
> >  :
> >  :
> >  : _______________________________________________________
> >  : Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
> >  : Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp
> >  :
> >  : ___________________________________
> >  : UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> >  : FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> >  : Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  : ---
> >
> >
> >  ___________________________________
> >  UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> >  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> >  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
> Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to