What do you exactly mean by 'functional' ? Have you seen it working in
a live network ?
Unix for example, has provided more routing resources and it doesn't
seem to be a viable substitute for a router device.
Would Microsoft suggest to use the server as a router only ? The cost of a
PC would be much more expensive than a Cisco 25xx...
Thanks,
>From: "William E Gragido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Microsoft 'Routers'
>Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:29:03 -0500
>
>Excuse me, but Microsoft, Novell and various Unix platforms have been
>allowing for the routing of RIP and OSPF for a long time now. I have used
>Windows 2000 and it is functional.
>a
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Billy Monroe
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Microsoft 'Routers'
> >
> >
> > I see that Microsoft has provided resources to configure OSPF and RIP in
> > Windows 2000 servers
> > to provide routing capabilities.
> >
> > Has anybody evaluate this ? Do you think this could substitute 'real'
> > routers ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
