well I haven't got RIPv2 running to compare - which supports VLSM
do a "sh ip proto" and see if your Rip is version 2
Kevin Wigle
----- Original Message -----
From: "m. jean stockton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 06 July, 2000 23:10
Subject: Sh ip route rip command
> why does the following result from the 'sh ip route rip' command when rip
is
> classful?
>
>
> R 172.16.55.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14,
> Serial0
> R 172.16.50.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14,
> Serial0
> R 172.16.30.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14,
> Serial0
> R 172.16.40.0 [120/2] via 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0, 00:00:14,
> Serial0
>
> however, if you just use the 'sh ip route' command, the subnet mask does
not
> appear.
>
> thanks
>
>
> makeeda
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
