Here is a better diagram:

Net A - OSPF    Net B EIGRP
172.28.0.0
172.19.0.0      172.19.49-58.0       172.19.50.1
       X-------------------------X------------------------X
RouterA            Router B          Router C

I don't understand the need for the 'no auto-summary' command. I have full
connectivity within the EIGRP network and I am not redistributing eigrp into
ospf. I use the static route on Router A to avoid the redistribution.
(Although the next thing I will probably try is redistributing EIGRP into
OSPF, cos I am out of ideas).

Also, is the metric really necessary for ospf. The default metric for an E2
route is 20, and there is only one route to NetB, so the lower the metric
the bettter?

The point of these changes is to prevent Network B from knowing anything
about network A, only how to get to it.

I should also mention that I have constructed the network in a lab and
everything works great, but I can't simulate the 1000 network ospf database,
possible routing loops and convergence time.

Thanks for the help so far,

Dion

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Swartz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday 20 July 2000 13:09
> To:   Radford Dion
> Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: EIGRP and OSPF
> 
> 1.  You need to assign a default-metric or specify the metric at the end
> of
> your redistribute commands
> 2.  Under EIGRP try the command 'no auto-summary'
> example:
>  Router A
>  router ospf 100
>    redistribute static subents metric 100
>    network 172.19.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 11
>    passive-interface serial 1
>  Router B
>  router eigrp 51
>   no auto-summary
>   redistribute static metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500
>   network 172.19.0.0
>   passive-interface serial 0
> 
> John Swartz
> ccie, ccnp, ccdp, mcse+i, mcsd, cne
> Boson Software and Training
> KRANG Router Simulator at http://www.routeru.com
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Radford Dion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:51 AM
> Subject: EIGRP and OSPF
> 
> 
> > Has anyone out there ever integrated OSPF and EIGRP?
> >
> > We have a requirement where we want to take a part of our network out of
> the
> > OSPF area and make it into an EIGRP network. (Good reasons for this, I
> can
> > assure you)
> >
> >
> > Network A - OSPF Network B - EIGRP
> > 172.28.0.0
> > 172.19.0.0 172.19.49-56.0
> > 172.19.50.1
> >
> >
> X--------------------------------------------------X----------------------
> --
> > ---------------X
> > Router A                Serial Line     Router B
> > Router C
> >
> >
> >
> > What I have tried
> > Router A: Static routes for subnetwork B pointing to Router B,
> > redistributing the static routes into OSPF and making the serial
> interface
> > passive.
> > Router B: Static route 0.0.0.0 pointing to Router A, redistribute static
> > routes in EIGRP and making serial interface passive.
> >
> > Router A
> > router ospf 100
> >   redistribute static subents
> >   network 172.19.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 11
> >   passive-interface serial 1
> >   exit
> > !static routes into network B
> > ip route 172.19.48.0 255.255.240.0 172.19.159.253
> >
> > Router B
> > router eigrp 51
> >  redistribute static
> >  network 172.19.0.0
> >  passive-interface serial 0
> > !
> > !default route into network A
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.19.159.252
> >
> > Router C
> > router eigrp 51
> >  network 172.19.0.0
> > !
> >
> >
> > It didn' work.
> >
> >
> > Router C had the correct gateway of last resort, yet you couldn't get to
> it
> > from Network A (except from Router A).
> >
> > However, I could access devices on the 172.28.0.0 network from router C
> > (172.28.0.0 is in another OSPF area). I think it could be due to the
> fact
> > that we are using the same major network number for both OSPF and EIGRP?
> >
> > If anyone has any ideas let me know.
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dion
> >
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ---
> 
> 
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to