On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Matt C. Lange wrote:
> I have eigrp and OSPF running in my home lab(5 rouetrs total)
> Try not redistributing static routes but ospf into eogrp and eigrp into
> ospf. This works for me. I will send you the config of the router doing the
> redistribution.
This is a bad idea without redistribution filters................
>
> Matt C. Lange
> CCNP CCDP MCSE CS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Radford Dion
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 10:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EIGRP and OSPF
>
>
> Has anyone out there ever integrated OSPF and EIGRP?
>
> We have a requirement where we want to take a part of our network out of the
> OSPF area and make it into an EIGRP network. (Good reasons for this, I can
> assure you)
>
>
> Network A - OSPF Network B - EIGRP
> 172.28.0.0
> 172.19.0.0 172.19.49-56.0
> 172.19.50.1
>
> X--------------------------------------------------X------------------------
> ---------------X
> Router A Serial Line Router B
> Router C
>
>
>
> What I have tried
> Router A: Static routes for subnetwork B pointing to Router B,
> redistributing the static routes into OSPF and making the serial interface
> passive.
> Router B: Static route 0.0.0.0 pointing to Router A, redistribute static
> routes in EIGRP and making serial interface passive.
>
> Router A
> router ospf 100
> redistribute static subents
> network 172.19.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 11
> passive-interface serial 1
> exit
> !static routes into network B
> ip route 172.19.48.0 255.255.240.0 172.19.159.253
>
> Router B
> router eigrp 51
> redistribute static
> network 172.19.0.0
> passive-interface serial 0
> !
> !default route into network A
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.19.159.252
>
> Router C
> router eigrp 51
> network 172.19.0.0
> !
>
>
> It didn' work.
>
>
> Router C had the correct gateway of last resort, yet you couldn't get to it
> from Network A (except from Router A).
>
> However, I could access devices on the 172.28.0.0 network from router C
> (172.28.0.0 is in another OSPF area). I think it could be due to the fact
> that we are using the same major network number for both OSPF and EIGRP?
>
> If anyone has any ideas let me know.
> Thanks,
>
> Dion
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal
Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
