I've found that you cannot do this, at least not when you do nat to a pool of addresses. You have to do static nat, then overload the rest. I tried adding overload to the end of my existing nat statment with the pool, it started PATing the addresses from the beginning. Instead of using the 1:1 from the pool, then pating anything beyond that.
""Lee Carter"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yes you can just take your nat statement (ip nat inside source list 1...) > and add the word overload on the end of the command. > > You will use a 1:1 NAT for the first set of users. Once your IP's are used > up you will use PAT. It is important to note that some issues arise with PAT > versus NAT like IPSEC or DLSW. > > just an fyi. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66708&t=66672 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
