Zsombor Papp wrote:
> At 10:21 PM 6/24/2003 +0000, MADMAN wrote:
> 
>> The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
>> the spokes.  It doesn't matter if your uni or bi,
> 
> 
> You can actually buy unidirectional PVC service? What do people do with 
> that?
> 
> Curious,
> 
> Zsombor

   No you can't buy unidirectional, at least I have never heard of any 
such thing and we have over 100,000 frame ports in service.  I made that 
comment based on the posters use of the terms, I didn't try to imply 
they existed.

   Dave

> 
>>  you have 2 DLCI's per
>> PVC, one on each end.  In our frame network we using local addressing of
>> DLCI's, DLCI 16 could be on both ends of a PVC.  Some carries use what
>> is called global which I think you may be refering to.  The users don't
>> have control of the DLCI numbering if connecting to the public frame
>> network but can request DLCI's which we can usually accomodate.  I have
>> no idea what a "forward" and "return" DLCI is!?!
>>
>>    Dave
>>
>> annlee wrote:
>> > Even if it is "switched from spoke-to-spoke", at Layer 1 the spokes 
>> connect
>> > via the hub. And to do anything with the traffic, Layer 2 must be
>> > consulted -- which gives us Priscilla's DLCI switching table. And, 
>> unless
>> > the traffic is unidirectional, you will need DLCIs for the opposite
>> > direction, as well. I don't know Cisco FR that well, but in at least 
>> some
>> > vendors' FR implementations, the "return" DLCIs do not have to have the
>> same
>> > numbers as the "forward" ones. That actually enables you to number
>> according
>> > to a pattern which indicates connectionality. And it also makes the 
>> DLCI
>> > switching table twice the size that Priscilla showed.
>> >
>> > Annlee
>> >
>> > ""Larry Letterman""  wrote in message
>> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >>My opinion is that it will go to the hub site since it's a point to
>> >>point network..
>> >>If the hub were to be a multi-point connection to the spokes, which
>> >>would be one network,
>> >>Then the traffic could be switched from spoke to spoke...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Larry Letterman
>> >>Cisco Systems
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>-----Original Message-----
>> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> >>Aaron Ajello
>> >>Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:06 AM
>> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>Subject: FR concept question [7:71263]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked a 
>> couple
>> >>people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
>> >>
>> >>If I've got two frame relay spoke sites connected point to point with a
>> >>hub site and a server in one spoke site copies a file to a server in 
>> the
>> >>other spoke site, does all the traffic pass through the hub site, or is
>> >>it switched within the frame cloud?
>> >>
>> >>I guess what I'm wondering is does a frame cloud act somewhat like a
>> >>lan, where initially packets will go through the default gateway and be
>> >>routed and then the following packets will be switched?
>> >>
>> >>thanks.
>> -- 
>> David Madland
>> CCIE# 2016
>> Sr. Network Engineer
>> Qwest Communications
>> 612-664-3367
>>
>> "Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
>> can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson
-- 
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367

"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71346&t=71263
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to