I worked with some WAN implementations (not Cisco equipment) where the
traffic was unidirectional, probably for QoS and/or billing purposes.

""Zsombor Papp""  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 07:56 PM 6/24/2003 +0000, annlee wrote:
> >Even if it is "switched from spoke-to-spoke", at Layer 1 the spokes
connect
> >via the hub. And to do anything with the traffic, Layer 2 must be
> >consulted -- which gives us Priscilla's DLCI switching table. And, unless
> >the traffic is unidirectional, you will need DLCIs for the opposite
> >direction, as well. I don't know Cisco FR that well, but in at least some
> >vendors' FR implementations, the "return" DLCIs do not have to have the
same
> >numbers as the "forward" ones.
>
> The two DLCIs that identify the two ends of a PVC to the user('s routers)
> don't have to be the same. However a PVC always provides bidirectional
> connection, AFAIK, so regardless of implementation you will be able to
send
> traffic in both directions. Are you saying that in some cases you might
> need a total of 4 DLCIs to establish one bidirectional connections between
> two routers? Why would this be an advantage?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Zsombor
>
> >  That actually enables you to number according
> >to a pattern which indicates connectionality. And it also makes the DLCI
> >switching table twice the size that Priscilla showed.
> >
> >Annlee
> >
> >""Larry Letterman""  wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > My opinion is that it will go to the hub site since it's a point to
> > > point network..
> > > If the hub were to be a multi-point connection to the spokes, which
> > > would be one network,
> > > Then the traffic could be switched from spoke to spoke...
> > >
> > >
> > > Larry Letterman
> > > Cisco Systems
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> > > Aaron Ajello
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:06 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: FR concept question [7:71263]
> > >
> > >
> > > This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked a
couple
> > > people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
> > >
> > > If I've got two frame relay spoke sites connected point to point with
a
> > > hub site and a server in one spoke site copies a file to a server in
the
> > > other spoke site, does all the traffic pass through the hub site, or
is
> > > it switched within the frame cloud?
> > >
> > > I guess what I'm wondering is does a frame cloud act somewhat like a
> > > lan, where initially packets will go through the default gateway and
be
> > > routed and then the following packets will be switched?
> > >
> > > thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71304&t=71263
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to