Hi Fred, Yes we are using vlans. Hence why we purchased the types of switches
What I listed was a suggestion in which I asked if that way to would work. I know you can create another vlan sub-interface and start moving the the new addresses. I was thinking of the idea that if the switches can accept more than 2 default routes then why wont that way work What is wrong with dual default routes? As i understand according to how these works there will be a primary default etc regards, seun >From: "Reimer, Fred" >To: "gab S.E jones" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: switch default gateway question [7:72288] >Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:11:24 -0400 > >Say what? > >Why don't you just create additional VLANs for the new address space(s) and >move PC's to the new VLANs as their addresses are changed? There is no >need >to be messing around with dual default routes. You could move all of the >switches over to the new address space immediately, or change them over >time >to the new address and VLAN. > >If you are not using VLANs, then why did you purchase 4506s, 3550s, and >6509s? > >Fred Reimer - CCNA > > >Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 >Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 > > >NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which >may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). >If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please >notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named >recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print >or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: gab S.E jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:48 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: switch default gateway question [7:72288] > >Basically I want to know how best to approach the situation. Our network is >all statically mapped no dynamic routing > >our switches(4506,3550,6509) are going to be changed to a different address >range. the switches can accept more than one default gateway. >The core routers addresses has to be changed to the same subnet as the >switches soon > >1)the switch old ip address is on a 11/8 address pointing to the core >router(interface) with a 11/8 address >2)now the switch addresses are being changed to a 10/16(subnetted) address >and the default gateway has to point to the core with a 10/16 address as >well > >Myu approach was to > >1)configure the swith with another default pointing to a 10/16 >2)configure a secondary interface on the core with a 10/16 address >3)the other core routers connected to this core will be also given a >secondary of 10/16 address >4)then on the core routers put floating statics for all our original routes >to point to the default GW 10/16 addresses > >I presume that because the swithes now have to defalt GW statements that >the >swith will automatically send packest for pc's of 10 and 11 addresses. >While >we slowly migrate all our lan devices to the new 10/16 GW > >5)will start gradually changing the lan devices to start pointing to the >10/16 GW > >Please correct me if im thinking of this the wrong way. > >Any advice will be greatly appreciated > >My apologies if I didnt explain myself properly > >regards, >seun _________________________________________________________________ Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today! http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72319&t=72288 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
