Hi people,

My sincere, sincere apologies that i didnt explain the situation more
clearly. I deserve to get attacked.
Have only started working on this customers network for a few days now

Yes it is a flat network (thanks Fred). Have just started to review this
customers network and still dont know all the details to fully yet(the
customers dont either believe it or not)

What I listed was a suggestion in which I asked if that way too would work
which i have noticed is not a good idea even if it might work.


My apologies Zsombor i mis quoted my self what I meant to say was you can
use statics to load balance as well.

e.g will load balance 

Ip route 100.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.1 
Ip route 10.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.2 

e.g will as a backup 

ip route 100.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.1 
ip route 10.5.0.0 255.255.0.0 100.0.1.2 5

Fred that was the original plan I had in mind as well thanks. I was going to
be moving the PC's that are all in one VLAN to a bunch of separate VLANs. I
just implied on the poissibilty of using another default route to point to
as another way of moving the pc's across as I have never done it that way
before.

hi Priscilla thanks for your input. I do know how you feel I find it
frustrating as well when I dont understand questions. My apologies on
mis-guidiance in my explaination as I just rushed it.
I was told to just re-address the routers for this customer without any
prior good knowledge of how the Lan team have gone about their design

>Was the network all one big flat network with everything being addressed
with 11.0.0.0/8 before? And the switches >really were just L2 switches? And
now they are moving to subnets and using the switches as routers?
this is correct Priscilla

I thank everyone for thier input even if I didnt make myself clear 

regards,
seun



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72465&t=72288
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to