I'm not saying that your way won't work. To tell you the truth, I don't really understand your method. I've just been through a lot of migrations myself in the past with customers, and creating new VLANs and moving users over to them is the typical way it is accomplished.
Fred Reimer - CCNA Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -----Original Message----- From: gab.seun jones.ewulomi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: switch default gateway question [7:72288] Hi Fred, Yes we are using vlans. Hence why we purchased the types of switches What I listed was a suggestion in which I asked if that way to would work. I know you can create another vlan sub-interface and start moving the the new addresses. I was thinking of the idea that if the switches can accept more than 2 default routes then why wont that way work What is wrong with dual default routes? As i understand according to how these works there will be a primary default etc regards, seun >From: "Reimer, Fred" >To: "gab S.E jones" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: switch default gateway question [7:72288] >Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:11:24 -0400 > >Say what? > >Why don't you just create additional VLANs for the new address space(s) and >move PC's to the new VLANs as their addresses are changed? There is no >need >to be messing around with dual default routes. You could move all of the >switches over to the new address space immediately, or change them over >time >to the new address and VLAN. > >If you are not using VLANs, then why did you purchase 4506s, 3550s, and >6509s? > >Fred Reimer - CCNA > > >Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338 >Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050 > > >NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which >may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s). >If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please >notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named >recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print >or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: gab S.E jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:48 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: switch default gateway question [7:72288] > >Basically I want to know how best to approach the situation. Our network is >all statically mapped no dynamic routing > >our switches(4506,3550,6509) are going to be changed to a different address >range. the switches can accept more than one default gateway. >The core routers addresses has to be changed to the same subnet as the >switches soon > >1)the switch old ip address is on a 11/8 address pointing to the core >router(interface) with a 11/8 address >2)now the switch addresses are being changed to a 10/16(subnetted) address >and the default gateway has to point to the core with a 10/16 address as >well > >Myu approach was to > >1)configure the swith with another default pointing to a 10/16 >2)configure a secondary interface on the core with a 10/16 address >3)the other core routers connected to this core will be also given a >secondary of 10/16 address >4)then on the core routers put floating statics for all our original routes >to point to the default GW 10/16 addresses > >I presume that because the swithes now have to defalt GW statements that >the >swith will automatically send packest for pc's of 10 and 11 addresses. >While >we slowly migrate all our lan devices to the new 10/16 GW > >5)will start gradually changing the lan devices to start pointing to the >10/16 GW > >Please correct me if im thinking of this the wrong way. > >Any advice will be greatly appreciated > >My apologies if I didnt explain myself properly > >regards, >seun _________________________________________________________________ Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today! http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72323&t=72288 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
