Hi,
I would suggest you use passsive interface command to
prevent these updates from being propagated into your network
eg
router eigrp X
passive-interface Dialer1
passive-interface FastEthernet0
passive-interface Group-Async0
passive-interface Serial0:15
passive-interface Serial1:15
passive-interface Serial2:15
passive-interface Serial3:15
Cyrax
""C. Cubberley"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> We are using Cisco AS5200's for our remote users to dial-in to our
site.
> We have configured a local pool of ip addresses that they get assigned
when
> they connect. (ip local pool as01 10.20.211.1 10.20.211.254).
> We are using EIGRP as the routing protocol, and when I show ip routes for
> one of the users, I see that they have a 32-bit subnet mask.
> (10.20.211.137/32 is directly connected, Async30). When they disconnect,
> the routing table believes it has to update this change. (I think.) Is
> there a way to specify a different subnet mask?
> I would like to reduce the incidences of routing updates from these
devices.
> I think I am getting lost in EIGRP. Does anyone know if I am on the right
> track in following the way EIGRP works? (I have read the CISCO sites
> documentation, and been to the troubleshooting EIGRP presentation at
> networkers, but think I need to understand this better!)
>
> Thanks,
> Connie Cubberley
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
