I was using passive interface for the dialer and async-group, the suggestion
that solved my problem was from Brian Feeny, CCNA, CCDA at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], who sent :
"I think what you're saying is that the Access Server is announcing the
individule /32's which is creating alot of route table entries on your
network? If you would like to reduce that.......as much as possible, then
you can implement route aggregation/summarization, so that the access
server just announces a summary."
And, when I applied route summarization for the 10.20.211.0 network on the
ethernet interface, everything cleared up. It seems really simple in
retrospect, but its like the old days when the person who knew where to
whack the mainframe got the most pay and results!
Thanks to all for the suggestions...
Connie Cubberley
Manager 1, IP
State of New Jersey
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cyrax
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ip local pool addressing question
Hi,
I would suggest you use passsive interface command to
prevent these updates from being propagated into your network
eg
router eigrp X
passive-interface Dialer1
passive-interface FastEthernet0
passive-interface Group-Async0
passive-interface Serial0:15
passive-interface Serial1:15
passive-interface Serial2:15
passive-interface Serial3:15
Cyrax
""C. Cubberley"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> We are using Cisco AS5200's for our remote users to dial-in to our
site.
> We have configured a local pool of ip addresses that they get assigned
when
> they connect. (ip local pool as01 10.20.211.1 10.20.211.254).
> We are using EIGRP as the routing protocol, and when I show ip routes for
> one of the users, I see that they have a 32-bit subnet mask.
> (10.20.211.137/32 is directly connected, Async30). When they disconnect,
> the routing table believes it has to update this change. (I think.) Is
> there a way to specify a different subnet mask?
> I would like to reduce the incidences of routing updates from these
devices.
> I think I am getting lost in EIGRP. Does anyone know if I am on the right
> track in following the way EIGRP works? (I have read the CISCO sites
> documentation, and been to the troubleshooting EIGRP presentation at
> networkers, but think I need to understand this better!)
>
> Thanks,
> Connie Cubberley
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
winmail.dat
