Wow..Two questions. What is doing your routing and What program is doing the file
transfer?
Pete
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/3/2000 at 3:05 PM jeongwoo park wrote:
>Hi all
>My file server is on 140.222.20.1/24
>Clients are on these four subnets.
>140.222.150.0/24
>140.222.181.0/24
>140.222.237.0/24
>140.222.200.0/24
>
>There is such a slow data transfer rate going from any
>of these 4 subnets to the subnet where the server is.
>All clients get DHCP ip addresses
>As a suggestion, someone told me to supernet.
>As far as I know, in order to supernet, subnet ip
>addresses should be contiguous, and I think the idea
>of supernetting is to include multiple subnets into
>one supernetted subnet. So we can transfer data within
>one subnet instead of transferring through router for
>subnet-to-subnet transfer.
>However, these five subnet ip addresses are not
>contiguous.
>How can I supernet non-contiguous subnet ip addresses?
>By following Cisco book instruction on supernetting, I
>got this address: 140.222.0.0/16 Is this correct?
>If this was correctly supernetted, what should I do
>next?
>Should I go to each individual stations (about 600
>stations) for new TCP/IP setup? I am sure there should
>be better way to handle this.
>
>I have only several months of network experience. I am
>still newbie.
>I will appreciate your help
>Thanks in adv.
>
>jw
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>>From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer.
>http://experts.yahoo.com/
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
