R1 is acting as the telco side of the frame-relay switch. It
doesn't/shouldn't care about any layer 3 protocols, just it's DLCI mappings
between interfaces.
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/
""Frank"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8vvs0e$6kh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8vvs0e$6kh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> yeah ,i got a type mistake in config of int s1/1,i have corrected it.
> the config on dte is quite simple ,i think.
> It's as follows:
> R2:
> interface Serial1/1
> ip address 172.16.40.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
>
> router ospf 1
> network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
> R3:
> interface Serial1/1
> ip address 172.16.30.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
>
> router ospf 1
> network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
>
> from the following result ,the frame swith works ,i think.
> and i found the dte routers got DLCI automatically.
> ****************************
> R1#sh frame pvc
>
> PVC Statistics for interface Serial1/0 (Frame Relay DCE)
>
> Active Inactive Deleted Static
> Local 0 0 0 0
> Switched 1 0 0 0
> Unused 0 0 0 0
>
> DLCI = 110, DLCI USAGE = SWITCHED, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE =
> Serial1/0
>
> input pkts 137 output pkts 132 in bytes 11442
> out bytes 10932 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0
> in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0
> in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
> out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 Num Pkts Switched
> 137
>
> pvc create time 02:32:06, last time pvc status changed 01:57:16
>
> PVC Statistics for interface Serial1/1 (Frame Relay DCE)
>
> Active Inactive Deleted Static
> Local 0 0 0 0
> Switched 1 0 0 0
> Unused 0 0 0 0
>
> DLCI = 100, DLCI USAGE = SWITCHED, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE =
> Serial1/1
>
> input pkts 133 output pkts 137 in bytes 11000
> out bytes 11442 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0
> in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0
> in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0
> out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 Num Pkts Switched
> 133
>
> pvc create time 02:28:35, last time pvc status changed 01:57:16
> ****************************
>
> but the ospf seems failed ,R2 and R3 couldn't find each other ,after i add
> static route,they got connected.
> i don't think we need to run ospf on R1 ,right?
> another question is when i run ospf neighbor command ,i got such
error,why?
> "R2(config-router)#nei 172.16.30.1
> OSPF: Neighbor address does not map to an interface"
>
> Thanks.
>
> frank
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
