On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Anthony Anderson wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> I have a slight problem and I know you people can help. I have a
> question regarding OSPF behavior and the loopback address. Our backbone is
> running OSPF and we have installed a Cache-Flow server to cache webpages.
> The cache-flow does not support OSPF so I attempted to redistribute OSPF
> into RIP. I use a private address for the loopback on all of our routers
> and the advertisement to the cacheflow shows the loopback as the interface
> the advertisement is coming from. So, say a network of 192.168.5.1 lies of
> router A's serial port, the loopback address of that router is 10.0.2.2, and
> the ethernet interface is 172.16.0.2 - note - all devices share a common
> ethernet segment. The route in the cache-flow is: 192.168.5.1 via 10.0.2.2
> even though the ethernet address is a totally different network. Can someone
> explain why this is happening and what I can do about it? I have static
> routes configured now, but I would like to make it dynamic if possible.
set "ip ospf priority 2" on all interfaces except the one that is on the
network which is "known", on that one set priority to 1. This will force
the router id to be that interface
Brian
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Anthony Anderson CCNA
> Manager-Data Network Engineering
> Bluegrass Cellular, Inc.
>
> "Man's life, as required by his nature, is not the life of a mindless brute,
> of a looting thug or a mooching mystic,
> but the life of a thinking being -- not life by means of force or fraud,
> but life by means of achievement." - Ayn Rand
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny, CCNP+ATM, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]