You would lose redundancy (which sounds like what your going for here as
a priority over LB), but you could set certain vlans for one trunk and
the other vlans for another.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Trunk Load Balancing
if all the ports on access layer switch is in the same VLAN, you can not
do that.
Spantree will only allow one path forwarding packets.
Michael Yu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alldread AK2 Robert J wrote:
> I would like some opinions on load balancing across (2) 6509 switches
using
> trunk ports.
>
> Here is the scenario...
>
> 1 switch at the access layer, 2 switches and the distribution layer.
The
> access layer switch has a GIG trunk link to each of the 2 dist layer
> switches. How would I implement equal-cost load balancing in a round
robin
> fashion from the access layer switch to each of the 2 dist layer
switches.
>
> I would like to do this on a packet by packet level. CCO has some good
tips,
> but only for load balancing from 1 switch to 1 switch, not 1 switch to
2
> switches.
>
> Any advice and help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Skin-e
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
