Yes, what they have is correct. It's a floating static route that is
given an admin distance higher than the one derived through the routing
protocol. It is designed to kick in as a last resort. They are
routing all traffic to 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 out interface BRI0 and
setting an admin distance of 200 on that route.
There is nothing wrong with this and, in fact, it is quite normal.
Roman
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN Simulator
I have a question here? should you have an administrative distance defined
on your static route?
ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 BRI0 ??? 200
ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 BRI0 X.X.X.X 200
The X.X.X.X is the next hop IP Address and the 200 is your administrative
distance.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
