>At 10:25 AM 1/18/01, Tony van Ree wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>Late collisions will often occur when you have one end at full duplex the
>>other at half duplex. The full duplex will keep sending even after the
>>poor little half duplex has started to transmit. This interupts the half
>>duplex well into its transmission and whammo a late collision. This also
>>often occurs when autonegotiate is set on a switch and all appears to be
>>fine. I have found that to configure both ends manually is best.
>
>Why does anyone use autonegotiate?! Does it EVER work? &;-) Just
>wondering.....
>
>Priscilla
It is my understanding that the model on which Ethernet
autonegotiation is designed is the same one as used in male-female
communications.
>
>
>>Just a thought
>>
>>Teunis,
>>Hobart, Tasmania
>>Australia
>>
>>
>>On Wednesday, January 17, 2001 at 02:48:50 PM, Jim Healis wrote:
>>
>> > From CCO:
>> >
>> > Error Message
>> > %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: AMDP2/FE([dec]/[dec]), Late collision
>> >
>> > Explanation Late collisions occurred on the Ethernet/Fast Ethernet
>> > interface.
>> >
>> > Recommended Action If the interface is Fast Ethernet, verify that both
>> > peers are in the same duplex mode. For regular Ethernet, the system
>> > should recover. No action is required.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Kelly D Griffin wrote:
>> >
>> > > Does anyone know what causes this error message?
>> > >
>> > > Jan 17 16:32:35 CDT: %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: Ethernet0/1 transmit error
>> > >
>> > > Kelly D Griffin, CCNA
>> > > Network Engineer
>> > > Kg2 Network Design
>> > > http://www.kg2.com
>> > >
>
>
>________________________
>
>Priscilla Oppenheimer
>http://www.priscilla.com
>
>_________________________________
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
