That's the issue, when you setup NAT it requires an interace, not multiple
interfaces.
ip nat inside source list 1 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload
this needs to dynamically change to BRI0/0
Kevin L. Kultgen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stull, Cory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Kevin L. Kultgen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:01 PM
Subject: RE: Dialer NAT backup dilemma
> Kevin,
>
> I just got in a hurry so I'll give a quick short answer.... You should be
> able to do pat using the interface.. Define both the dialer interface and
> the dsl interface as outside interfaces and the local area network
interface
> as inside.. Setup the nat command to use the interface so that whenever
it
> goes out the dsl interface it will be PATted to that IP and whenever it
goes
> out the dialer interface it will be PATted to that IP address..
>
> I've never tried this but in theory it should work... Let me know if
> not...
>
> Thanks
> Cory
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin L. Kultgen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dialer NAT backup dilemma
>
>
> I have scoured all the books I have and CCO for an answer but keep coming
up
> dry. So I hope someone has an answer. It's not an ovely complex
scenario,
> and I would think that someone else has tripped across it before.
>
> I have a client that requires 24x7 Internet Access. The have a DSL Modem
> plugged into a 2611 (Eth 0/0) and a BRI NT1 WIC for backup. I can get it
> all to work, in terms of floating static routes and connectivity, but the
> catch is that they use a private address space and require the use of NAT.
> NAT doesn't appear to fail over. Actually it does but it continues to use
> the address of the Ethernet 0/0 interface, (Same for a Tunnel interface
that
> they have). Is there a way to set NAT up so that the address will change
to
> the new address assigned to the Dialer Interface? Maybe same for the
> Tunnel. I was thinking that a Loopback interface may be required but keep
> failing to see the appropriate usage...
>
> Any ideas? Like I said, it's not hugely complex and I'm sure that other
> people have tripped across it, but I don't see it documented anywhere.
>
> --
> Kevin L. Kultgen
>
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
