Here ya go... adjust as necessary. There are similar
examples on cisco.com.
ip nat pool backup 10.10.10.6 10.10.10.6 netmask
255.255.255.0
ip nat pool primary 2.2.2.10 2.2.2.20 netmask
255.255.255.0
ip nat inside source route-map backup pool backup
ip nat inside source route-map primary pool primary
access-list 1 permit any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
route-map backup permit 10
match ip address 1
match interface BRI1/0
route-map primary permit 10
match ip address 1
match interface Serial0/1
--- "Stull, Cory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> I just got in a hurry so I'll give a quick short
> answer.... You should be
> able to do pat using the interface.. Define both
> the dialer interface and
> the dsl interface as outside interfaces and the
> local area network interface
> as inside.. Setup the nat command to use the
> interface so that whenever it
> goes out the dsl interface it will be PATted to that
> IP and whenever it goes
> out the dialer interface it will be PATted to that
> IP address..
>
> I've never tried this but in theory it should
> work... Let me know if
> not...
>
> Thanks
> Cory
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin L. Kultgen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Dialer NAT backup dilemma
>
>
> I have scoured all the books I have and CCO for an
> answer but keep coming up
> dry. So I hope someone has an answer. It's not an
> ovely complex scenario,
> and I would think that someone else has tripped
> across it before.
>
> I have a client that requires 24x7 Internet Access.
> The have a DSL Modem
> plugged into a 2611 (Eth 0/0) and a BRI NT1 WIC for
> backup. I can get it
> all to work, in terms of floating static routes and
> connectivity, but the
> catch is that they use a private address space and
> require the use of NAT.
> NAT doesn't appear to fail over. Actually it does
> but it continues to use
> the address of the Ethernet 0/0 interface, (Same for
> a Tunnel interface that
> they have). Is there a way to set NAT up so that
> the address will change to
> the new address assigned to the Dialer Interface?
> Maybe same for the
> Tunnel. I was thinking that a Loopback interface
> may be required but keep
> failing to see the appropriate usage...
>
> Any ideas? Like I said, it's not hugely complex and
> I'm sure that other
> people have tripped across it, but I don't see it
> documented anywhere.
>
> --
> Kevin L. Kultgen
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
