There is no requirement for IBGP neigbors to be directly connected. Make
sure that you have the routes for all of the intermediate links and the
loopbacks in your routing table first.
""Richard Chang"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
98p8ls$chl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:98p8ls$chl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> For EBGP, you can use the ebgp-multihop command when the neighbors are not
> directly-connected. I was just wondering whether there is a similar
> work-around that anyone know of for IBGP.
>
> Basically, I am using loopback interfaces on these two routers and they
have
> to go through another hop before hitting each other. I configured IBGP on
> these two routers with those loopback addresses and found out that the BGP
> session can't be formed...
>
> Thanks
>
> Richard
>
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
