You do not need to worry about iBGP multi-hop since the TTL is not 1 (Not sure
what the default is for IOS). Need to make sure each neighbor knows how to
reach each other so your IGP must know about the destination prefix it is trying
to reach and have a valid next_hop in it's table.
/julian
""Richard Chang"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
98p8ls$chl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:98p8ls$chl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
: For EBGP, you can use the ebgp-multihop command when the neighbors are not
: directly-connected. I was just wondering whether there is a similar
: work-around that anyone know of for IBGP.
:
: Basically, I am using loopback interfaces on these two routers and they have
: to go through another hop before hitting each other. I configured IBGP on
: these two routers with those loopback addresses and found out that the BGP
: session can't be formed...
:
: Thanks
:
: Richard
:
:
: _________________________________
: FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
: Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
