>With all this Juniper stuff flying around, I remind you all to
>consider that core routing represents something like 16% of Cisco's
>revenue stream and Juniper only make core routers.
>
>Pete
Putting on my chef's hat, I have several tools that variously remove
apple cores, leaving the rest intact, or also slice the remaining
part. Does this mean that Victorinox, Sabatier, etc., are
significant players in the core market?
Those ...routers...that also slice the fruit into segments, clearly,
are distributed edge processors in the same housing as the core
router.
As far as the charges and countercharges about the Lightreading
tests, the Master of Networks asked the Novice,
"Grasshopper, what is the difference between a seller of used cars
and a networking marketdroid?"
"I know not, sensei. Enlighten me."
"The seller of used cars knows when he is lying."
In a different current controversy, one wonders if new.net has any
conception of the operational impact their product may have. See
continuing flames on NANOG.
It may be necessary to bring in a mediator to deal with the question
of whether Cisco is faster than Juniper, or vice versa. Perhaps Bill
Clinton can help explain the meaning of "is" in this context.
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
