"Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> Ah, but it was even worse in the Old Days of wooden ships, steel men,
> and xGS routers. Each telnet session on an MGS router took up about
> 20% of the CPU, at least around release 9.0. That was the show
> process overhead of just being logged in, not doing anything.
>
> Since you could have 5 sessions logged in, the probability of failure
> in a Cisco class is left as an exercise to the reader. ;=)
>
or...how about using snmp to check cpu utilization, only to discover that the
reason you were at 80-90% CPU was because of the snmp process? LOL
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
