5861.htm#xtocid135692
Dan- You hit the nail on the head !!! 16 Megs RAM & an upgrade path of
4.5(1), 4.5(2), 4.5(3), & 4.5(4)... Now to find which of my 2500's has 16
Megs running in it :-)
Thanks Everyone !!!
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Cotts"
To: "'Circusnuts'" ;
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: RE: Sup I IOS Upgrade Will Not Take [7:113]
> Watch the wrap.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/c5krn/sw_rns/78_
> 5861.htm#xtocid135692
>
> All of the 4.x Catalyst 5000 family supervisor engine software releases
> require a minimum of 16-MB RAM installed on
> your supervisor engine. All Catalyst 5000 family supervisor engines
> with at least 16-MB DRAM fully support software
> release 4.x.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:26 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Sup I IOS Upgrade Will Not Take [7:113]
> >
> >
> > Just checked my download folder & image 4.5(8) is 2.773 KB.
> > The CCO had no
> > minimum memory listed in the download information. If we were talking
> > routers, 4 FLASH/ 8 RAM should be enough (even compressed).
> >
> > Any takers here ???
> >
> > Thanks
> > Phil
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim Brown"
> > To:
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:07 PM
> > Subject: RE: Sup I IOS Upgrade Will Not Take [7:113]
> >
> >
> > > I thought the 4.5(8) image required 20MB? If not I wasted
> > some money on
> > > memory.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 3:49 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Sup I IOS Upgrade Will Not Take [7:113]
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm upgrading my 5000 (Supervisor I WS-X5009) from 2.4(4)
> > to 4.5.(8). I
> > > checked the IOS size & type before trying to load (4 FLASH
> > & 8 RAM), so
> > I'm
> > > pretty confident this part (IOS) is correct. When I load
> > the image "Life
> > Is
> > > Grand," until the switch reboots to accept the new version.
> > It seems as
> > > though the new uploaded image has disappeared, the switch
> > comes up in the
> > > old
> > > version. The new image does not register in the Sho
> > Version & Sho Flash
> > > output. This is a Sup I, so I cannot point the switch to a
> > particular IOS
> > > version (though it does not appear to be in FLASH) like
> > possible with a
> > Sup
> > > II's.
> > >
> > > Any advice is welcome !!!
> > >
> > > Thanks Everyone
> > > Phil
> > >
> > > PS- here is the Sho Ver
> > >
> > > CAT5K> shv er
> > >
> > > WS-C5000 Software, Version McpSW: 2.4(4) NmpSW: 2.4(4)
> > > Copyright (c) 1995-1997 by Cisco Systems
> > > NMP S/W compiled on Jan 23 1998, 11:54:52
> > > MCP S/W compiled on Jan 23 1998, 12:14:52
> > >
> > > System Bootstrap Version: 2.1
> > >
> > > Hardware Version: 1.9 Model: WS-C5000 Serial #: 003627851
> > >
> > > Module Ports Model Serial # Hw Fw Fw1 Sw
> > > ------ ----- ---------- --------- ------ ------- -------
> > > --------------------
> > > 1 2 WS-X5009 003627851 1.9 2.1 2.1(4) 2.4(4)
> > > 2 12 WS-X5213A 006491956 2.0 1.4 2.4(4)
> > >
> > > Module DRAM FLASH NVRAM Used Available
> > > ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
> > > 1 8192K 4096K 256K 99K 157K
> > >
> > > Uptime is 0 day, 0 hour, 22 minutes
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct
> > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=127&t=113
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
