How about Novell CNE. It also have a same thing.

Donald B Johnson jr wrote:

> Yeah I got a mcse in 96 and thought the same thing when it happened to that
> program. OH well!!!!!!!! I still want to be part of the swelling ranks. You
> could drop out and help us out though :>).
> Don
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tennesee Stud"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:28 AM
> Subject: CCIE depreciation in 2 years [7:1882]
>
> > I was wondering what others thought about the CCIE.  It seems to me now
> that
> > there are so many books and training materials geared towards the CCIE,
it
> > is making it easier to obtain the CCIE.  With a steady diet of the right
> > books ( which everyone seems to agree on) and hands on time with routers
> and
> > switches ( which to me is the only obstacle), it does not seem as
> difficlut
> > as it proclaimed (and I think most people see that).My opinion is the
CCIE
> > will be devalued  considerably in the next few years (As far as salary is
> > concerned as well as prestige)  As others have pointed out, the CCIE
> > population is growing at a faster rate (routing and switching), and even
> > though the demand is high for the CCIE now, I think in 2 years there will
> be
> > a difference in the way the industry views CCIE's....
> >
> > .02 thats all
> >
> > Tennesee Stud
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1913&t=1882
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to