Hello Several people have asserted that IS-IS (for IP) has demonstrated more scalability than OSPF. What accounts for this? I have heard that it has to do with IS-IS being able to take advantage of Partial-route Updates when IP information changes, as opposed to running Dijkstra all the time, is that the only factor, or are there other reasons? Thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5207&t=5207 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] NRF
- Re: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Curtis Rose
- Re: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Curtis Rose
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Curtis Call
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Curtis Call
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Andras Bellak
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] Andras Bellak

