>BTW, I have been told by folks who work in really big networks that none of >the routing protocols scale beyond 4-5K routers. As an interesting aside, a >few weeks ago on NANOG there was a discussion about the largest RIPv1 >network in existence. It was revealed that until a year or two ago, Xerox >used RIPv1 and had a few thousand routers running RIPv1 on the network. I believe that the RIP network you are referring to had a few thousand nodes, not a few thousand routers. I doubt a few thousand routers could handle RIPs max 15 hop limitation. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5362&t=5207 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207] NRF
- Re: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Curtis Rose
- Re: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Curtis Rose
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Curtis Call
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Curtis Call
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Andras Bellak
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Chuck Larrieu
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Andras Bellak
- Re: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... NRF
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:52... Priscilla Oppenheimer