Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: Subject: Re: Does MPLS really live up to all its hype? [7:6151] > MPLS complements IP routing. Neither replaces the other. There > might have been some arguments in that area when (my mind > blanks--they were acquired by Nokia) introduced the first label > switching machines, but the hardware and algorithms have caught up. > There's a huge amount of FUD here, just as there is with respect to > the technically meaningless term "L3 switching". Ipsilon maybe? they developed the data-driven (rather than control-driven) Ipsilon Flow Management Protocol (IFMP). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6200&t=6151 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Does MPLS really live up to all its h... NRF
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... KY
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... KY
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... NRF
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... NRF
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... KY
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... andyh
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... NRF
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... David Chandler
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: Does MPLS really live up to ... Irwin Lazar
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... David Chandler
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... David Chandler
- RE: Does MPLS really live up to ... Michael Cohen
- RE: Does MPLS really live up to ... Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... Kent Yu
- Re: Does MPLS really live up to ... Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist