Hi Remmert,
Thank you for your advise. Below is the updated network diagram.
(10.10.10.1/24)
| E0
-------------------------
| Cisco 2501 R1 |
-------------------------
/ S0 \ S1
(Link 1) 2Mbps / \ 2Mbps (Link 2)
/ S0/1 \ S0/1
----------------- -----------------
| 7206 R2 | | 7206 R3 |
----------------- ------------------
| F0/0 | F0/0
(192.168.1.1/24) (192.168.1.2/24)
I am current only having 1 link from R1 to R2, using static routing. I will
be commissioning another 2Mbps link from R1 to R3, and would like to load
share the 2 links. Currently, R2 is running OSPF, and R3 is also running
OSPF.
I would not prefer running dynamic routing protocol over the 2 2Mbps, as
they will utilize the bandwidth when updating the routing table. I think
someone actually mentioned about multilink ppp in the previous mails. Can I
know more about this type of implementation?? What are the pros and cons of
implementing multilink ppp? Can load sharing be achieved??
Regards,
Cheeyong
At 05:55 AM 6/8/01 -0400, Remmert Veen wrote:
>Hi Cheeyong,
>
>HSRP indeed won't do the trick, this is a redundancy mechanism.
>
>To enable load-sharing, check what routing protocol you are running. OSPF
>and EIGRP are able to do equal-cost load-sharing by default. If the 2 serial
>links are unequal cost, I'd recommend EIGRP to provision unequal-cost
>load-sharing.
>
>Your network diagram unfortunately isn't too clear. From which network to
>which network do you want to load-balance?
>
>I hope this helps for now, let me know if I can further help you out.
>
>Regards,
>Remmert
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7815&t=7687
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
