Shot in the dark:  I read something in a M$ publication today that a
WinModem not on the HCL can cause serious networking problems.  I have yet
to validate this, but your problem is goofy.  I would have guessed NAT
overloading as well.  There's always the "proper" way to repair M$
problems... Format and Reinstall!

Good Luck.
Post a resolution when you get one.

Nate



""George Murphy CCNP""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> =0D
> Hey Folks... I just wanted to get your opinions on this:=0D
> =0D
> I snagged a side job (pays great) and am wondering about a situation. Ok.=
> =2E. here goes. One PC out of about 15 that work great can see Server res=
> ources but cannot browse the web or ping outside. They are using an NT 2k=
>  Server,  2900XL switch and CELLPipe router to the web via ADSL. I have t=
> ried sitching drives, copycatting configs from other clients, reinstallin=
> g stack and client (no domain just a workgroup) and even a different NIC,=
>  still no web for this node. I have checked th router and switch and ther=
>  are no filters and no access lists.... yada yada yada... The only clue i=
> s the last group they had in did not resolve the server backup issues and=
>  left things unresolvd so they let them go.... this makes me think there =
> may be some trickery in her since these folks left the router exposed to =
> the web with no password (which I have fixed) and were able to access unt=
> il yesterday. I guess my question in retrospect is there some way to bloc=
> k the bosses PC from TCP/IP via MAC address that I am rusty or unknowledg=
> able of????? What arer your thoughts.... The client is DHCP and the serve=
> r is no domain but providing DHCP and workgroup..?????
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type Image/jpeg]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9934&t=9612
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to