RR's are normally used in small to medium sized implementations. Confederations are normally used in large implementations. I imagine on the lab they'll give some clue as to which one is required.
The k1d ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm currently tearing apart BGP as part of my IE studies. It's not too bad > since I come from a Network Service Provider background. But, I have run > into a conflict in regards to RRs vs. Confeds. I probably don't need to > straighten this out for the Written but when it comes to the lab I'd like to > know which route to go down. I have no idea how the lab poses it's topology > but if given the requirement to configure a simulated "large" network and > then having to choose whether to implement RRs or Confeds I wonder which one > Cisco prefers. I'm assuming that as part of the lab, the idea is to create > solutions that work and in doing so, solutions that are as simple as > possible and as short as possible. > > I'd like to hear comments about the pros and cons of each option in regards > to how Cisco might prefer to see implementation. Meanwhile, I'm going to > review all available case studies on CCO. > > Thanks, > Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29972&t=29968 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
