You still did gts and not FRTS. You should specify frts out with CIR, mincir, bc, etc. For inbound interface, I still recommend CAR.
""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > OK... I tested everything. > > I am using FRTS instead of GTS. > > The config i am using is > > ! > interface Serial1 > bandwidth 256 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > no keepalive > no fair-queue > frame-relay traffic-shaping > ! > interface Serial1.1 multipoint > ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > no arp frame-relay > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515 > ! > interface Serial1.2 point-to-point > bandwidth 64 > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > no ip directed-broadcast > no arp frame-relay > no cdp enable > frame-relay interface-dlci 516 > class t64 > ! > map-class frame-relay t64 > frame-relay traffic-rate 16000 64000 > frame-relay bc 64000 > ! > > > Router#sh int ser 1 > Serial1 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > Description: > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 40/255, rxload 6/255 > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set > Keepalive not set > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface broadcasts 2 > Last input 00:01:25, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3w4d > Queueing strategy: fifo > Output queue 0/40, 631 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > 5 minute input rate 7000 bits/sec, 5 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 120000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > 6423620 packets input, 648992350 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 96 giants, 0 throttles > 96 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > 7910460 packets output, 3812516915 bytes, 0 underruns > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > 0 carrier transitions > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > Router#sh frame-relay pvc 516 > > PVC Statistics for interface Serial1 (Frame Relay DTE) > > DLCI = 516, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = STATIC, INTERFACE = Serial1.2 > > input pkts 5790202 output pkts 7230308 in bytes 543324449 > out bytes 3254580372 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 > in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 > in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 > out bcast pkts 5 out bcast bytes 380 > pvc create time 3w3d, last time pvc status changed 3w3d > cir 16000 bc 16000 be 48000 limit 6250 interval 125 > mincir 8000 byte increment 250 BECN response no > pkts 37256 bytes 5958824 pkts delayed 500 bytes delayed 181477 > shaping inactive > traffic shaping drops 0 > Serial1.2 dlci 516 is first come first serve default queueing > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drop, 500 dequeued > > Router#sh traffic-shape ser 1.2 > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment > Adapt > I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) > Active > Se1.2 16000 6250 16000 48000 125 > 250 - > > This is all the statistics, and as you can see is just limiting the inbound > traffic, not the outbound. It is working as the GTS. > > I am using IOS ver 12.0(3)T. > > What else can I do? > > Regards, > > Joseba Izaga > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:19 PM > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > Well, unless I'm just suffering from Friday Afternoon Brain, the traffic > > figures still look weird to me. > > Can you look at the traffic figures from the other end of the PVC? If so, > > what do they say? > > > > I guess if the txload/rxload figures are for a 5-minute exponential > > average (which I believe they are) and the 5-minute input/output figures > > are a normal average (which I'm not sure of), those figures could make > > sense, but you'd have to have a pretty extreme traffic pattern (which I > > suppose you could if you've been testing throughput). > > > > What happens if you use FRTS instead of GTS? > > > > JMcL > > > > > > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 02:05 pm ----- > > > > > > "Joseba Izaga" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 18/01/2002 11:54 am > > Please respond to "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc: > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > s1.1 is not used. > > > > To the physical interface I connected a frame-relay radio-modem configured > > as Star (multipoint). So s1.1 is just for mapping clinet units. > > > > s1.1 doesn4t have traffic at all. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:39 PM > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > Something's a bit odd here. > > > >From your 'show int', BW is 256 Kbps, txload is 64/255 (i.e close > > enough > > > to 64 Kbps for a bandwidth of 256 Kbps), yet the 5-minute output rate is > > > 235 Kbps. Are you sure your bandwidth is configured correctly? > > > > > > Your 'show int' is for the physical interface, so it will include > > traffic > > > for all sub-interfaces (actually, in my experience, even if you do a > > 'show > > > int' for the sub-interface, the txload and rxload figures will actually > > be > > > for the whole physical interface, which is a nuisance). According to > > the > > > config you gave earlier, you have three sub-interfaces on that physical > > > interface, only two of which are traffic shaped. Is that where your > > extra > > > traffic is coming from? > > > > > > JMcL > > > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 10:34 am ----- > > > > > > > > > "Joseba Izaga" > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > 18/01/2002 09:02 am > > > Please respond to "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > cc: > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "steve skinner" > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:33 AM > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > steve, > > > > > > Remember that I have limited each sub-int to 64kbps using the command > > > > > > traffic-shape rate 64000 12000 24000 > > > > > > (as steven recommend) > > > > > > but if I see the Serial statistics, I see more traffic than it suppose > > to > > > be. It should be a 128kbps max. For that reason I said that it is not > > > function. > > > > > > Router#show int s 1 > > > Serial1 is up, line protocol is up > > > Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial > > > Description: WII > > > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec, > > > reliability 255/255, txload 64/255, rxload 2/255 > > > Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set > > > Keepalive not set > > > Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface > > broadcasts > > > 20 > > > Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never > > > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1w6d > > > Queueing strategy: fifo > > > Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops > > > 5 minute input rate 43000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec > > > 5 minute output rate 235000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec > > > 3060238 packets input, 295363575 bytes, 0 no buffer > > > Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > > > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort > > > 4012231 packets output, 4121859399 bytes, 0 underruns > > > 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets > > > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > > 0 carrier transitions > > > DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up > > > > > > Joseba > > > > > > > hi.... > > > > > > > > it seems ok to me as there is packets on the "stats" command but, > > > > > > > > i need to ask this....sorry. > > > > > > > > you said before that it is not working ,but how do you know it`s not > > > working > > > > ???...i feel i am bieng a bit thick and missing something... > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > > > steve > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > >To: "steve skinner" , > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:07:23 -0800 > > > > > > > > > >Steve, > > > > > > > > > >This is what I got > > > > > > > > > >Router#show traffic-shape statistics > > > > > Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets > > > > >Bytes Shaping > > > > >I/F List Depth Delayed > > > Delayed > > > > >Active > > > > >Se1.2 0 289 45537 0 > > > > >0 no > > > > >Se1.3 0 36573 5751328 114 > > > > >63246 no > > > > >Router# > > > > > > > > > >Also, > > > > > > > > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.2 > > > > > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess > > > > >Interval Increment Adapt > > > > >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int > > > > >(ms) (bytes) Active > > > > >Se1.2 64000 2000 8000 8000 125 > > > > >1000 - > > > > > > > > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.3 > > > > > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess > > > > >Interval Increment Adapt > > > > >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int > > > > >(ms) (bytes) Active > > > > >Se1.3 32000 2000 8000 8000 250 > > > > >1000 - > > > > > > > > > >So, what do you think? > > > > > > > > > >Joseba Izaga > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > >From: "steve skinner" > > > > >To: > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 AM > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi ... > > > > > > > > > > > > if you do a "show traffic-shape" what does the "byte limit" count > > > say > > > > >for > > > > > > each VC.... > > > > > > > > > > > > also what does > > > > > > > > > > > > show traffic-shape stats ...say > > > > > > > > > > > > hth > > > > > > > > > > > > steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > > >Reply-To: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:08:16 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >This is the configuration I have in all 17204s. As you can see, I > > > am > > > > >using > > > > > > >GTS, but is not working, it is not limiting to 64 or 32. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >interface Serial1 > > > > > > > description WII-Enlace-Sebaco > > > > > > > bandwidth 256 > > > > > > > no ip address > > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > > > > > > > no keepalive > > > > > > > no fair-queue > > > > > > >! > > > > > > >interface Serial1.1 multipoint > > > > > > > description MP-Sebaco > > > > > > > ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > > no arp frame-relay > > > > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515 > > > > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.3 519 > > > > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.4 523 > > > > > > >! > > > > > > >interface Serial1.2 point-to-point > > > > > > > bandwidth 64 > > > > > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > > no arp frame-relay > > > > > > > traffic-shape rate 64000 8000 8000 1000 > > > > > > > no cdp enable > > > > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 516 > > > > > > >! > > > > > > >interface Serial1.3 point-to-point > > > > > > > bandwidth 64 > > > > > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 > > > > > > > no ip directed-broadcast > > > > > > > no arp frame-relay > > > > > > > traffic-shape rate 32000 8000 8000 1000 > > > > > > > no cdp enable > > > > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 520 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Joseba Izaga > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > >From: "mike" > > > > > > >To: "Joseba Izaga" ; > > > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:17 PM > > > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It should work using 12.0 on a 1720 router. We use 12.0.7T on > > > our > > > > > > >1720s, > > > > > > > > and traffic shape using map-classes and priority queueing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What does your config look like, what commands are you using > > to > > > > >verify > > > > > > > > traffic shaping is/isn't on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > From: "Joseba Izaga" > > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:38 PM > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I already did a frame-relay traffic shaping and limit with > > > CIR, > > > > >but > > > > > > >did > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > function. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What else can I do instead of upgrading the IOS? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > From: "Steven A. Ridder" > > > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:22 PM > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try upgrading the IOS or do CBWFQ or frame-relay traffic > > > shaping > > > > >and > > > > > > > > limit > > > > > > > > > > with CIR. Create a map class and add map class to > > > subinterface. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay > > > radiomodem > > > > > > >connected > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > > > > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the > > sub-interface > > > to > > > > >64k. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape > > 64000 > > > on > > > a > > > > > > >CISCO > > > > > > > > > 2620 > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > it is working good, but not on the 1720. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joseba Izaga > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33616&t=32072 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
