Nop....there is no traffic over s1.1

Ok, is GTS limiting inbound and outbound traffic?, or just limit outbound
traffic?

Joseba

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven A. Ridder" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]


> Is s1.1 adding to that traffic?  Could you be getting the 128k with s1.2
and
> 1.3, plus whatever 1.1 is sending?
>
>
> ""Joseba Izaga""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "steve skinner"
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> >
> > steve,
> >
> > Remember that I have limited each sub-int to 64kbps using the command
> >
> > traffic-shape rate 64000  12000  24000
> >
> > (as steven recommend)
> >
> > but if I see the Serial statistics, I see more traffic than it suppose
to
> > be. It should be a 128kbps max. For that reason I said that it is not
> > function.
> >
> > Router#show int s 1
> > Serial1 is up, line protocol is up
> >   Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial
> >   Description: WII
> >   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
> >      reliability 255/255, txload 64/255, rxload 2/255
> >   Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set
> >   Keepalive not set
> >   Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface
broadcasts
> > 20
> >   Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never
> >   Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1w6d
> >   Queueing strategy: fifo
> >   Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
> >   5 minute input rate 43000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
> >   5 minute output rate 235000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec
> >      3060238 packets input, 295363575 bytes, 0 no buffer
> >      Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
> >      0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
> >      4012231 packets output, 4121859399 bytes, 0 underruns
> >      0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
> >      0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
> >      0 carrier transitions
> >      DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=up
> >
> > Joseba
> >
> > > hi....
> > >
> > > it seems ok to me as there is packets on the "stats" command but,
> > >
> > > i need to ask this....sorry.
> > >
> > > you said before that it is not working ,but how do you know it`s not
> > working
> > > ???...i feel i am bieng a bit thick and missing something...
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > steve
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > >To: "steve skinner" ,
> > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:07:23 -0800
> > > >
> > > >Steve,
> > > >
> > > >This is what I got
> > > >
> > > >Router#show traffic-shape statistics
> > > >             Access      Queue     Packets     Bytes          Packets
> > > >Bytes       Shaping
> > > >I/F         List          Depth                       Delayed
> > Delayed
> > > >Active
> > > >Se1.2                    0             289           45537         0
> > > >0             no
> > > >Se1.3                    0             36573       5751328     114
> > > >63246     no
> > > >Router#
> > > >
> > > >Also,
> > > >
> > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.2
> > > >               Access    Target     Byte      Sustain     Excess
> > > >Interval     Increment     Adapt
> > > >I/F          List         Rate        Limit     bits/int
bits/int
> > > >(ms)         (bytes)          Active
> > > >Se1.2                    64000     2000     8000        8000
125
> > > >1000             -
> > > >
> > > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.3
> > > >               Access    Target     Byte      Sustain     Excess
> > > >Interval     Increment     Adapt
> > > >I/F          List         Rate       Limit      bits/int
bits/int
> > > >(ms)         (bytes)          Active
> > > >Se1.3                    32000    2000      8000        8000
250
> > > >1000             -
> > > >
> > > >So, what do you think?
> > > >
> > > >Joseba Izaga
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "steve skinner"
> > > >To:
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > hi ...
> > > > >
> > > > > if you do a "show traffic-shape"  what does the "byte limit" count
> say
> > > >for
> > > > > each VC....
> > > > >
> > > > > also what does
> > > > >
> > > > > show traffic-shape stats ...say
> > > > >
> > > > > hth
> > > > >
> > > > > steve
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > > > >Reply-To: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:08:16 -0500
> > > > > >
> > > > > >This is the configuration I have in all 17204s. As you can see, I
> am
> > > >using
> > > > > >GTS, but is not working, it is not limiting to 64 or 32.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >interface Serial1
> > > > > >  description WII-Enlace-Sebaco
> > > > > >  bandwidth 256
> > > > > >  no ip address
> > > > > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > >  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> > > > > >  no keepalive
> > > > > >  no fair-queue
> > > > > >!
> > > > > >interface Serial1.1 multipoint
> > > > > >  description MP-Sebaco
> > > > > >  ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0
> > > > > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > >  no arp frame-relay
> > > > > >  frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515
> > > > > >  frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.3 519
> > > > > >  frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.4 523
> > > > > >!
> > > > > >interface Serial1.2 point-to-point
> > > > > >  bandwidth 64
> > > > > >  ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > > > > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > >  no arp frame-relay
> > > > > >  traffic-shape rate 64000 8000 8000 1000
> > > > > >  no cdp enable
> > > > > >  frame-relay interface-dlci 516
> > > > > >!
> > > > > >interface Serial1.3 point-to-point
> > > > > >  bandwidth 64
> > > > > >  ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > > > > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > >  no arp frame-relay
> > > > > >  traffic-shape rate 32000 8000 8000 1000
> > > > > >  no cdp enable
> > > > > >  frame-relay interface-dlci 520
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Joseba Izaga
> > > > > >
> > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >From: "mike"
> > > > > >To: "Joseba Izaga" ;
> > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:17 PM
> > > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It should work using 12.0 on a 1720 router.  We use 12.0.7T on
> our
> > > > > >1720s,
> > > > > > > and traffic shape using map-classes and priority queueing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What does your config look like, what commands are you using
to
> > > >verify
> > > > > > > traffic shaping is/isn't on?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:38 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I already did a frame-relay traffic shaping and limit with
> CIR,
> > > >but
> > > > > >did
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > function.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What else can I do instead of upgrading the IOS?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: "Steven A. Ridder"
> > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:22 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Try upgrading the IOS or do CBWFQ or frame-relay traffic
> > shaping
> > > >and
> > > > > > > limit
> > > > > > > > > with CIR.  Create a map class and add map class to
> > subinterface.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ""Joseba Izaga""  wrote in message
> > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay
> radiomodem
> > > > > >connected
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the
sub-interface
> > to
> > > >64k.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape
64000
> on
> > a
> > > > > >CISCO
> > > > > > > > 2620
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > it is working good, but not on the 1720.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Joseba Izaga
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > > http://www.hotmail.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32383&t=32072
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to