Well, unless I'm just suffering from Friday Afternoon Brain, the traffic
figures still look weird to me.
Can you look at the traffic figures from the other end of the PVC? If so,
what do they say?
I guess if the txload/rxload figures are for a 5-minute exponential
average (which I believe they are) and the 5-minute input/output figures
are a normal average (which I'm not sure of), those figures could make
sense, but you'd have to have a pretty extreme traffic pattern (which I
suppose you could if you've been testing throughput).
What happens if you use FRTS instead of GTS?
JMcL
----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 02:05 pm -----
"Joseba Izaga"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18/01/2002 11:54 am
Please respond to "Joseba Izaga"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
s1.1 is not used.
To the physical interface I connected a frame-relay radio-modem configured
as Star (multipoint). So s1.1 is just for mapping clinet units.
s1.1 doesn4t have traffic at all.
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> Something's a bit odd here.
> >From your 'show int', BW is 256 Kbps, txload is 64/255 (i.e close
enough
> to 64 Kbps for a bandwidth of 256 Kbps), yet the 5-minute output rate is
> 235 Kbps. Are you sure your bandwidth is configured correctly?
>
> Your 'show int' is for the physical interface, so it will include
traffic
> for all sub-interfaces (actually, in my experience, even if you do a
'show
> int' for the sub-interface, the txload and rxload figures will actually
be
> for the whole physical interface, which is a nuisance). According to
the
> config you gave earlier, you have three sub-interfaces on that physical
> interface, only two of which are traffic shaped. Is that where your
extra
> traffic is coming from?
>
> JMcL
> ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 10:34 am -----
>
>
> "Joseba Izaga"
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 18/01/2002 09:02 am
> Please respond to "Joseba Izaga"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "steve skinner"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
>
> steve,
>
> Remember that I have limited each sub-int to 64kbps using the command
>
> traffic-shape rate 64000 12000 24000
>
> (as steven recommend)
>
> but if I see the Serial statistics, I see more traffic than it suppose
to
> be. It should be a 128kbps max. For that reason I said that it is not
> function.
>
> Router#show int s 1
> Serial1 is up, line protocol is up
> Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial
> Description: WII
> MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
> reliability 255/255, txload 64/255, rxload 2/255
> Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set
> Keepalive not set
> Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface
broadcasts
> 20
> Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never
> Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1w6d
> Queueing strategy: fifo
> Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
> 5 minute input rate 43000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
> 5 minute output rate 235000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec
> 3060238 packets input, 295363575 bytes, 0 no buffer
> Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
> 4012231 packets output, 4121859399 bytes, 0 underruns
> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
> 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
> 0 carrier transitions
> DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up
>
> Joseba
>
> > hi....
> >
> > it seems ok to me as there is packets on the "stats" command but,
> >
> > i need to ask this....sorry.
> >
> > you said before that it is not working ,but how do you know it`s not
> working
> > ???...i feel i am bieng a bit thick and missing something...
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > steve
> >
> >
> > >From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > >To: "steve skinner" ,
> > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:07:23 -0800
> > >
> > >Steve,
> > >
> > >This is what I got
> > >
> > >Router#show traffic-shape statistics
> > > Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets
> > >Bytes Shaping
> > >I/F List Depth Delayed
> Delayed
> > >Active
> > >Se1.2 0 289 45537 0
> > >0 no
> > >Se1.3 0 36573 5751328 114
> > >63246 no
> > >Router#
> > >
> > >Also,
> > >
> > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.2
> > > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess
> > >Interval Increment Adapt
> > >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int
> > >(ms) (bytes) Active
> > >Se1.2 64000 2000 8000 8000 125
> > >1000 -
> > >
> > >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.3
> > > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess
> > >Interval Increment Adapt
> > >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int
> > >(ms) (bytes) Active
> > >Se1.3 32000 2000 8000 8000 250
> > >1000 -
> > >
> > >So, what do you think?
> > >
> > >Joseba Izaga
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "steve skinner"
> > >To:
> > >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 AM
> > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > >
> > >
> > > > hi ...
> > > >
> > > > if you do a "show traffic-shape" what does the "byte limit" count
> say
> > >for
> > > > each VC....
> > > >
> > > > also what does
> > > >
> > > > show traffic-shape stats ...say
> > > >
> > > > hth
> > > >
> > > > steve
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > > >Reply-To: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:08:16 -0500
> > > > >
> > > > >This is the configuration I have in all 17204s. As you can see, I
> am
> > >using
> > > > >GTS, but is not working, it is not limiting to 64 or 32.
> > > > >
> > > > >interface Serial1
> > > > > description WII-Enlace-Sebaco
> > > > > bandwidth 256
> > > > > no ip address
> > > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> > > > > no keepalive
> > > > > no fair-queue
> > > > >!
> > > > >interface Serial1.1 multipoint
> > > > > description MP-Sebaco
> > > > > ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0
> > > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > no arp frame-relay
> > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515
> > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.3 519
> > > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.4 523
> > > > >!
> > > > >interface Serial1.2 point-to-point
> > > > > bandwidth 64
> > > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > no arp frame-relay
> > > > > traffic-shape rate 64000 8000 8000 1000
> > > > > no cdp enable
> > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 516
> > > > >!
> > > > >interface Serial1.3 point-to-point
> > > > > bandwidth 64
> > > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > > no arp frame-relay
> > > > > traffic-shape rate 32000 8000 8000 1000
> > > > > no cdp enable
> > > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 520
> > > > >
> > > > >Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >Joseba Izaga
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "mike"
> > > > >To: "Joseba Izaga" ;
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:17 PM
> > > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > It should work using 12.0 on a 1720 router. We use 12.0.7T on
> our
> > > > >1720s,
> > > > > > and traffic shape using map-classes and priority queueing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What does your config look like, what commands are you using
to
> > >verify
> > > > > > traffic shaping is/isn't on?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > > > > To:
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:38 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I already did a frame-relay traffic shaping and limit with
> CIR,
> > >but
> > > > >did
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > function.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What else can I do instead of upgrading the IOS?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Steven A. Ridder"
> > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:22 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Try upgrading the IOS or do CBWFQ or frame-relay traffic
> shaping
> > >and
> > > > > > limit
> > > > > > > > with CIR. Create a map class and add map class to
> subinterface.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message
> > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay
> radiomodem
> > > > >connected
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the
sub-interface
> to
> > >64k.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape
64000
> on
> a
> > > > >CISCO
> > > > > > > 2620
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > it is working good, but not on the 1720.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Joseba Izaga
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > http://www.hotmail.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32399&t=32072
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
