Something's a bit odd here.
>From your 'show int', BW is 256 Kbps, txload is 64/255 (i.e close enough
to 64 Kbps for a bandwidth of 256 Kbps), yet the 5-minute output rate is
235 Kbps. Are you sure your bandwidth is configured correctly?
Your 'show int' is for the physical interface, so it will include traffic
for all sub-interfaces (actually, in my experience, even if you do a 'show
int' for the sub-interface, the txload and rxload figures will actually be
for the whole physical interface, which is a nuisance). According to the
config you gave earlier, you have three sub-interfaces on that physical
interface, only two of which are traffic shaped. Is that where your extra
traffic is coming from?
JMcL
----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2002 10:34 am -----
"Joseba Izaga"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18/01/2002 09:02 am
Please respond to "Joseba Izaga"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
----- Original Message -----
From: "steve skinner"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
steve,
Remember that I have limited each sub-int to 64kbps using the command
traffic-shape rate 64000 12000 24000
(as steven recommend)
but if I see the Serial statistics, I see more traffic than it suppose to
be. It should be a 128kbps max. For that reason I said that it is not
function.
Router#show int s 1
Serial1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial
Description: WII
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 256 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 64/255, rxload 2/255
Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set
Keepalive not set
Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 20/0, interface broadcasts
20
Last input 00:00:05, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1w6d
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
5 minute input rate 43000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 235000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec
3060238 packets input, 295363575 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
4012231 packets output, 4121859399 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
0 carrier transitions
DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up
Joseba
> hi....
>
> it seems ok to me as there is packets on the "stats" command but,
>
> i need to ask this....sorry.
>
> you said before that it is not working ,but how do you know it`s not
working
> ???...i feel i am bieng a bit thick and missing something...
>
> cheers
>
> steve
>
>
> >From: "Joseba Izaga"
> >To: "steve skinner" ,
> >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:07:23 -0800
> >
> >Steve,
> >
> >This is what I got
> >
> >Router#show traffic-shape statistics
> > Access Queue Packets Bytes Packets
> >Bytes Shaping
> >I/F List Depth Delayed
Delayed
> >Active
> >Se1.2 0 289 45537 0
> >0 no
> >Se1.3 0 36573 5751328 114
> >63246 no
> >Router#
> >
> >Also,
> >
> >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.2
> > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess
> >Interval Increment Adapt
> >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int
> >(ms) (bytes) Active
> >Se1.2 64000 2000 8000 8000 125
> >1000 -
> >
> >Router#sh traffic-shape serial 1.3
> > Access Target Byte Sustain Excess
> >Interval Increment Adapt
> >I/F List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int
> >(ms) (bytes) Active
> >Se1.3 32000 2000 8000 8000 250
> >1000 -
> >
> >So, what do you think?
> >
> >Joseba Izaga
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "steve skinner"
> >To:
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:17 AM
> >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> >
> >
> > > hi ...
> > >
> > > if you do a "show traffic-shape" what does the "byte limit" count
say
> >for
> > > each VC....
> > >
> > > also what does
> > >
> > > show traffic-shape stats ...say
> > >
> > > hth
> > >
> > > steve
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > >Reply-To: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:08:16 -0500
> > > >
> > > >This is the configuration I have in all 17204s. As you can see, I
am
> >using
> > > >GTS, but is not working, it is not limiting to 64 or 32.
> > > >
> > > >interface Serial1
> > > > description WII-Enlace-Sebaco
> > > > bandwidth 256
> > > > no ip address
> > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> > > > no keepalive
> > > > no fair-queue
> > > >!
> > > >interface Serial1.1 multipoint
> > > > description MP-Sebaco
> > > > ip address 132.1.21.1 255.255.255.0
> > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > no arp frame-relay
> > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.2 515
> > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.3 519
> > > > frame-relay map ip 132.1.21.4 523
> > > >!
> > > >interface Serial1.2 point-to-point
> > > > bandwidth 64
> > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > no arp frame-relay
> > > > traffic-shape rate 64000 8000 8000 1000
> > > > no cdp enable
> > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 516
> > > >!
> > > >interface Serial1.3 point-to-point
> > > > bandwidth 64
> > > > ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
> > > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > > no arp frame-relay
> > > > traffic-shape rate 32000 8000 8000 1000
> > > > no cdp enable
> > > > frame-relay interface-dlci 520
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >
> > > >Joseba Izaga
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "mike"
> > > >To: "Joseba Izaga" ;
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:17 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > It should work using 12.0 on a 1720 router. We use 12.0.7T on
our
> > > >1720s,
> > > > > and traffic shape using map-classes and priority queueing
> > > > >
> > > > > What does your config look like, what commands are you using to
> >verify
> > > > > traffic shaping is/isn't on?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Joseba Izaga"
> > > > > To:
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:38 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I already did a frame-relay traffic shaping and limit with
CIR,
> >but
> > > >did
> > > > > not
> > > > > > function.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What else can I do instead of upgrading the IOS?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Steven A. Ridder"
> > > > > > To:
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:22 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Traffic-rate shape [7:32072]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Try upgrading the IOS or do CBWFQ or frame-relay traffic
shaping
> >and
> > > > > limit
> > > > > > > with CIR. Create a map class and add map class to
subinterface.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ""Joseba Izaga"" wrote in message
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have a 1720 with 2 WIC-1T. I have 2 frame-relay
radiomodem
> > > >connected
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > port. Each port has 2 sub-interfaces.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What I need is to limit the bandwidth on the sub-interface
to
> >64k.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Right now I am using the command traffic-rate shape 64000
on
a
> > > >CISCO
> > > > > > 2620
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > it is working good, but not on the 1720.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The 1720 has 12.0 IOS version.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So, why the 1720 is not limiting the bandwitdh?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Or, there is another way to limit the bandwitdh?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Joseba Izaga
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32380&t=32072
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
