I wish I got paid for doing work for them. However even if I had the
knowledge to write one of the papers they don't have, I would probably lack
the technical writing skills. However if they want to start paying me I'd
probably be a less obvious in my praise.

I would agree that anything on their site is obtainable for free from
anywhere else. However reading the papers I find that they written in an
easy to understand form, so you spend less time having to reread information
and can spend more time thinking about it. Granted I don't think it's
perfect, I'd like a better structure on the site, I think it's an excellent
tool for someone who isn't pursuing their Masters degree but instead one of
the Cisco Certifications. :) (that'd be me) 

Robert Fowler
Unpaid, Unofficial site endorser of certificationzone.com who is merely
stating his long winded opinion in pursuit of his 3rd major certification.
:)

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

I don't know, last time someone made a pitch like that. I found out they
got paid for doing work for the site. My employer gives me 3500 a year
for educational stuff, and that money is going for a Masters degree.



All I need is an internet terminal and some free time to get those
things you mentioned :-) Anyway, to each his own....



-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Brian Zeitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]



Actually, the site provides much more than that. I subscribed over a
month ago and it is full of information that is compiled so that it is
easy to read etc. I have the PowerPoint slides also, but I've found the
diagrams, tests etc are much more valuable and make things easier to
learn. I think it's worth every dollar my employer spent. :)

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

Figure out the font then? It is probably Wingdings, ha ha. I could
figure this out, but I don't put much stock in this site. People really
pay money for white papers? The jokes on the people that send money to
that site to subscribe! I have a bunch of MPLS stuff from Cisco like
Documents, Powerpoint slides etc. Maybe they encrypted it in DES? Ha ha.




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]

This isn't in Russian, it's a transliteration of English
using Cyrillic characters.  April Fool.

Someone's cute idea - bet the English character version
is going to cost.



Fred.
> Yea.. I am sure it is great.. if you are fluent in Russian....
>
> Tim
> CCIE 9015
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

> David Wolsefer
> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MPLS White Paper Announcement [7:40035]
>
>
> Galina Pildush is publishing an MPLS white paper today on
> www.certificationzone.com. You better hurry though because it will
only be
> available free for today only. This should be an excellent source for
those
> studying for the C&S exam. As a CCIE and JNCIE, Galina knows MPLS
well.
>
> Regards,
>
> David Wolsefer
Get the award winning ISP, AT&T WorldNet Service
http://download.att.net/webtag
&i=40070&t=40035
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40102&t=40035
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to