>Why would you want to work for a place with such stupid
>interviews in the first place?  If they select their employees
>based on how they play "Stranded in the Desert" or whatever the
>heck that was, then it's probably best you don't work there. 
>I'm sure the management there is awful. 
>
>Stuff like that is a sure sign their managers have too much
>time on their hands, and there's almost nothing worse than a
>clueless manager with too much time.
>
>Someone needs to send those managers a Dilbert calendar! 
>
>I'm sorry to hear it didn't go well, but you should forget
>about them and move on to a better company.
>
>John

I have a friend that used to work in Schlumberger as a technical 
patent paralegal, and she loved the place. Don't know how typical her 
experience or yours is, but I can check with her to see if this is 
anything she's heard.

I'm not totally opposed, incidentally, to tests like that IF THERE IS 
ALSO SOLID TECHNICAL INTERVIEWING, and the job needs good 
communications skills (the introduction) and possibly the ability to 
handle multiple items under stress (the desert). I do believe when 
you play with peoples' heads like this, it's only fair that the 
interviewers explain what they were trying to learn.

When I'm interviewing people, I suppose I ask some questions that are 
intended to help me learn the way the candidate thinks. For example, 
once we've talked a bit and I have a pretty good knowledge of their 
background, I pose a problem to them that I'm fairly sure they can't 
answer. I tell them that I don't expect them to give me a correct 
answer, but to explain to me how they would approach getting 
information and coming up with a solution.  That tells me a couple of 
things -- are they willing to say "I don't know," and "But this is 
how I'll find out."

I also tend to ask "ok, tell me what you do that's weird.  In this 
business, there has to be something."  Again, it tests flexibility 
and communication.

>
>
>
>---- On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Mark Zhang ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
>
>>  hi,everybody,I have a interview appointment at 9:00 AM.
>>  The position is Network Engineer in SNS(schlumberger network
>solutions
>>  sector).But I falled,at least i think so.
>>  At first,every candidater have a chance to intraduce oneself
>for 1
>>  minute in
>>  English.Then every 5 person get a group to play a game named
>Desert
>>  Survive.Game as this:Just image you and some people lose in a
>deep
>>  desert by
>>  an airplane problem,so plz list the most important thing to
>the lest
>>  from 15
>>  tools you could use,first time by your own choose,the second
>by your
>>  group.
>>  Maybe I do not show good in the self-introduce,then I paly
>the game,I
>>  choose
>>  more close to the expert answer the my group,but the
>schlumberger do not
>>  think I as the right person they are looking for.
>>  what a pity!I experienced in Motorola and a network
>company,have design
>>  a
>>  large scare voip network include about 40 nods,familiar with
>Cisco,But
>>  why?Just because a lose in the game?
>>
>>  B.RMark Zhang
>>
>>
>>  ---------------------------------
>>  Do You Yahoo!?
>>  Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40561&t=40553
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to