Network statements only advertise routes that exists in the routing table. Further, if you use a "mask" on the statement, you need to match the prefix exactly. Usually, one uses static routes to null0 to pin up aggregate routes, or normal static routes (non null0) for others.
At 09:22 AM 4/7/2002 -0400, Phil Barker wrote: >Hi Group, > >Hope someone can help out with this as I don4t have >access to my kit at the moment. > >I tried to set up my first BGP lab last week. >I configured a full iBGP mesh, three routers connected >in a triangle via serial lines. > >I set up (neighbour( statements on each router (Hope >Radia can forgive the extra vowel !!!) and advertised >the networks. > >I got the BGP table working but nothing was promoted >to the main routing table, and therefore could4nt ping >non directly connected interfaces. I tried various >approaches like putting a default route in and running >an IGP but still no promotion to the main table. > >Should this be possible with iBGP ? or is it a matter >of loop avoidance i.e the AS Numbers won4t be >prepended for the case of iBGP peers. > >Phil. > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Everything you'll ever need on one web page >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts >http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40749&t=40741 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
