This is why we love Priscilla. :-) Here we were making the ASSumption that we were using a classfull subnet mask.
Thank you, Priscilla, for once again letting us know we aren't really worthy! :-) --Tim Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > How many bits are defining network IDs and how many are > defining node IDs? > (that is, what's the subnet mask?) > > With some subnet masks, you have 3 segments in Scenario 2. With > other > subnet masks, you have a broken network (the routers can't talk > to each > other across the middle). > > Priscilla > > At 05:16 PM 4/7/02, Kent Browning wrote: > >Scenario 1 > >========== > > > >---int0-(R1)-int1 --------int0-(R2)-int1 --- > > > >Router 1 > >Int 0: 192.168.1.1 > >Int 1: 192.168.2.1 > > > >Router 2 > >Int 0: 192.168.2.2 > >Int 1: 192.168.3.1 > > > > > >Scenario 2 > >========== > > > >---int0-(R1)-int1 --------int0-(R2)-int1 --- > > > >Router 1 > >Int 0: 192.168.1.1 > >Int 1: 192.168.2.1 > > > >Router 2 > >Int 0: 192.168.3.1 > >Int 1: 192.168.4.1 > > > > > >Question: > >========= > >In Scenario 1, there are 3 segments: > >Segment1: 192.168.1.0 > >Segment2: 192.168.2.0 > >Segment3: 192.168.3.0 > >I know this is correct. > > > >In Scenario 2, how many segments are there? > >Is there anything wrong with routing router 1 to router 2 and > not using a > >common segment? > ________________________ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40825&t=40766 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
